From 0cb74ad15721acfab9027338b7eb10e60aa18c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kris Maglione <maglione.k@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:56:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Comment on 'new' in HACKING

---
 HACKING | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
index db503995..16d2d9c7 100644
--- a/HACKING
+++ b/HACKING
@@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ We try to be quite consistent, but of course, that's not always possible.
   CompletionContext() could return a cached object. What's thesnowdog's
   opinion and why do you, Kris, think it's better/cleaner?
 
+  I don't think it's better/cleaner, it just seemed to be a concensus.
+    --Kris
+
 == Testing/Optimization ==
 
 TODO: Add some information here about testing/validation/etc.
@@ -132,6 +135,4 @@ TODO: Document the existence of remote branches and discuss when and how
       to be added to a new branch. Keep in mind that git is not the most
       intuitive SCM.
 
-
-
 <!-- vim: set fdm=marker sw=4 ts=4 et ai: -->