From 64f7bfae48570a18dd4986d7bf409dd0423045ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kris Maglione <maglione.k@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:22:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Comment on SCM section in HACKING

---
 HACKING | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
index 57d5f947..85cc55c0 100644
--- a/HACKING
+++ b/HACKING
@@ -137,4 +137,12 @@ TODO: Document the existence of remote branches and discuss when and how
       to be added to a new branch. Keep in mind that git is not the most
       intuitive SCM.
 
-<!-- vim: set fdm=marker sw=4 ts=4 et ai: -->
+    I don't agree. git is about as intuitive as any other SCM, but,
+    regardless, it's by far one of the most popular. There are
+    countless git walkthroughs, FAQs, tips pages (not to mention 'git
+    help') that I don't see the need to duplicate them here. As for
+    branches, 'git branch' should be sufficient, and, if not, there's
+    a list on gitweb.
+      --Kris
+
+# vim: set fdm=marker sw=4 ts=4 et ai: