gryf/pentadactyl-pm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gryf/pentadactyl-pm.git synced 2025-12-23 16:52:25 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Respond to comment about literalArg

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kris Maglione
2008-11-25 19:38:00 +00:00
parent 48172401fa
commit 75c35aca60
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
content/commands.js
View File

@@ -431,6 +431,16 @@ function Commands() //{{{
integers and those below as strings, even if the former are integers and those below as strings, even if the former are
currently only used with 'literal'. I might be missing currently only used with 'literal'. I might be missing
something? -- djk something? -- djk
The reason I chose "+" was that some functions were already
using it when they expected a literal arg. "?" probably makes
more sense. I changed it to integers only in the cases where
literal is used, because then it has a different meaning, i.e.,
if we have this many args, push the rest of the string into the
last arg, bug don't worry whether we actually have that many
args. Using strings gave the wrong results, because "1" died
if you didn't have 1 arg, but "2" didn't die if you didn't have
2. Perhaps it should have a separate option. --Kris
*/ */
var literalIndex = argCount == "+" ? 0 : Math.max(argCount - 1, 0); var literalIndex = argCount == "+" ? 0 : Math.max(argCount - 1, 0);