gryf/pentadactyl-pm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gryf/pentadactyl-pm.git synced 2026-01-06 19:24:11 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Comment on 'new' in HACKING

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kris Maglione
2009-01-07 16:41:44 -05:00
parent 0cc75219d0
commit 15a64a0085
2 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
HACKING
View File

@@ -138,6 +138,14 @@ We try to be quite consistent, but of course, that's not always possible.
new immediately, but will probably do so over time, when I see it.
--mst
Actually, you're not sure of anything. You can call new (function (a)
a.substr(2)), and you don't get a new object. The only difference is
that it's called with 'this' set. Given that it's uncouth to name a
non-constructor function in CamelCase, and that most internal
constructors don't require new (and some, like String, break when
you use it), it just seems superfluous and distracting.
--Kris
== Testing/Optimization ==
TODO: Add some information here about testing/validation/etc.